Why You Think You’re Bad At Difficult Things Even When You’re Not
When seventeen-year-old Rohan from Delhi’s Modern School participated in the National Mathematics Olympiad, he walked out of the examination hall feeling completely defeated. The problems had been extraordinarily difficult—complex number theory, advanced geometry proofs, and abstract algebra questions that stretched beyond the regular curriculum.
“I did terribly,” he told his friend Priya in the waiting area. “I could barely solve three problems completely, and I’m not even confident those are right. I’m probably in the bottom 10% of participants. Everyone else must have done so much better than me.”
Priya looked surprised. “That’s exactly how I feel! I also only solved about three problems and felt lost on the rest. I’m sure I’m near the bottom too. The other participants probably found it much easier.”
As more students emerged, Rohan and Priya overheard similar conversations everywhere: “I bombed completely.” “I’m definitely the worst here.” “Everyone else must have done better than me.” “I could barely attempt half the problems.” Student after student expressed certainty that they had performed worse than average.
Their mathematics teacher, who had accompanied them, observed this pattern with knowing recognition. When the results came out weeks later, Rohan and Priya were both shocked: Rohan had scored in the 78th percentile, and Priya in the 82nd percentile. They had both performed well above average despite being convinced they were near the bottom.
“You both experienced the worse-than-average effect,” their teacher explained. “When a task is genuinely difficult—when almost everyone struggles with it—people tend to underestimate their relative performance. You assumed everyone else found it easier than you did. In reality, everyone found it similarly difficult, but the difficulty made you each feel uniquely incompetent. When tasks are easy, people overestimate their performance (better-than-average effect). When tasks are hard, people underestimate their performance (worse-than-average effect). Ironically, difficulty makes you feel like you’re doing worse than you actually are compared to others.”
She continued: “This happens because when you struggle with something difficult, you’re acutely aware of your own confusion and errors. You feel every moment of uncertainty and every problem you can’t solve. But you don’t feel other people’s confusion—you only see their confident exteriors. This makes you think ‘I’m struggling while everyone else is succeeding,’ when actually everyone is struggling but hiding it the same way you’re hiding yours. Difficult tasks make everyone feel incompetent, but we each think we’re uniquely incompetent.”
This cognitive bias—believing you’re worse than others at genuinely difficult tasks even when you’re performing at average or above-average levels—affects academic challenges, complex skills, and any domain where tasks are objectively hard. Understanding the worse-than-average effect reveals why difficult challenges undermine confidence, why talented people feel like impostors in challenging fields, and why we often quit difficult pursuits thinking we’re uniquely bad at them when actually we’re progressing normally.
What Is the Worse-Than-Average Effect?
The worse-than-average effect is the cognitive bias where people believe their performance or ability at difficult tasks is below average compared to others, even when their actual performance is average or above average. This is the opposite of the better-than-average effect (where people overestimate performance on easy tasks). When tasks are genuinely challenging and most people struggle, individuals perceive their struggle as evidence of being worse than others, not recognizing that others are struggling similarly. The difficulty makes you feel uniquely incompetent when actually the incompetence is shared but invisible to you.
The phenomenon was identified by researchers studying self-assessment accuracy. Research at Cornell University demonstrated that when people performed difficult tasks where most participants struggled, they systematically underestimated their relative performance—thinking they performed worse than average when they actually performed at or above average. The harder the task, the stronger this underestimation. When tasks were easy and most succeeded, people overestimated relative performance (better-than-average). Task difficulty reversed the direction of self-assessment bias.
According to studies from University of Chicago, the worse-than-average effect operates because people use different information to judge themselves versus others. When judging your own performance on difficult tasks, you have direct access to your struggle, confusion, and errors—these are psychologically salient. When judging others’ performance, you primarily see their behavior and hear their stated confidence, not their internal struggle. If everyone is struggling internally but appearing confident externally, you conclude “I’m struggling more than they are” when actually everyone is struggling similarly.
Research from Stanford University demonstrates that the worse-than-average effect is particularly strong when: (1) tasks are objectively very difficult (making struggle universal), (2) performance feedback is delayed or absent (leaving you uncertain about how you did), (3) others appear confident (hiding their own struggle), and (4) the task is unfamiliar (making it hard to calibrate what “normal” struggle looks like). These conditions make feeling uniquely incompetent nearly automatic on challenging tasks despite often being wrong.
The Parable of the Mountain Climb and the Hidden Struggle
A teaching tale tells of a sacred mountain that spiritual seekers climbed to reach a temple at its peak. The climb was genuinely difficult—steep paths, thin air, treacherous rocks, and exhausting elevation. Every climber struggled, but each struggled privately, showing only determination externally.
A young seeker named Arjun began the climb with enthusiasm but soon found it extraordinarily difficult. His legs ached, his breath came short, he stumbled on rocks, and he needed frequent rests. Looking at other climbers passing him or ahead on the path, he saw them moving steadily upward, apparently finding the climb manageable.
“I must be the weakest climber here,” Arjun thought. “Everyone else is handling this climb better than me. They’re moving confidently while I’m struggling with every step. I’m probably the worst climber on this mountain today. Maybe I’m not cut out for this spiritual path—I’m too weak physically and mentally.”
Ashamed of his perceived inadequacy, Arjun hid his struggle—resting only when others couldn’t see, breathing heavily only when alone, and maintaining a determined expression whenever other climbers were nearby. He didn’t want others to see how much he was struggling compared to how easily they seemed to be climbing.
What Arjun didn’t know was that nearly every other climber was experiencing the exact same thing. A woman who had passed him confidently was thinking: “That young man seemed to be climbing steadily. I’m struggling so much more than he appears to be. I must be the weakest here.” An elderly climber ahead was thinking: “These younger climbers are all doing better than me. I’m probably the slowest, weakest climber today.” Each climber saw others’ confident exteriors while feeling their own internal struggle, concluding they were uniquely inadequate.
A wise monk at a rest station observed this pattern and addressed the exhausted climbers: “You all believe you’re the worst climber on this mountain. Each of you thinks everyone else is finding this easier than you are. Each of you is hiding your struggle because you think you’re uniquely weak. But the truth is: this climb is genuinely difficult for everyone. You’re all struggling similarly. The mountain doesn’t discriminate—it challenges all who climb it.”
He continued: “You see others’ determined faces and steady movement, and you conclude they’re not struggling. But they’re seeing the same determined face and steady movement in you, and they’re concluding the same thing—that you’re not struggling. Everyone is struggling but hiding it, and everyone thinks they’re uniquely struggling because they can’t see others’ hidden difficulty. Your struggle isn’t evidence you’re worse than others. It’s evidence the mountain is difficult, which it is for all who climb it.”
The monk concluded: “When facing genuinely difficult challenges, don’t judge yourself by others’ exteriors. Your internal struggle doesn’t mean you’re failing while they’re succeeding. It means you’re all facing the same difficulty, but you only feel your own struggle directly. The climber who reaches the temple peak despite struggle is as accomplished as the one who appears to reach it easily—and often, there is no one finding it easy; they’re just better at hiding the difficulty.”
Buddhist philosophy addresses the worse-than-average effect in teachings about not comparing your inside to others’ outside. The Buddha taught that everyone experiences suffering and struggle (dukkha), but we naturally see our own suffering clearly while others’ suffering is less visible to us. This can make us feel our suffering is unique or excessive when actually it’s the common human condition. The teaching emphasizes recognizing that others struggle as you do, even when their struggle isn’t visible.
The Bhagavad Gita discusses this through Arjuna’s crisis of confidence before battle. Arjuna sees others appearing ready and confident and thinks “I’m afraid while they’re courageous; I’m weak while they’re strong.” Krishna reveals that Arjuna’s fear and doubt are natural responses to difficult circumstances that others also experience but express differently. The teaching emphasizes not judging yourself as uniquely inadequate when facing genuinely difficult challenges that trouble all who face them.
How Difficult Tasks Make Us Feel Uniquely Incompetent
In academic performance on challenging exams and subjects, the worse-than-average effect makes students underestimate their performance on difficult tests. Research shows that after genuinely difficult exams where most students struggle, students consistently predict they performed worse than average when actual results show most performed near average or above. The difficulty makes each student acutely aware of what they didn’t know, leading to belief that others knew more, when actually most students were similarly uncertain.
Studies from Yale University tracking student predictions versus actual performance on difficult exams found that 70-80% of students predicted below-average performance, but by definition only 50% could actually be below average. Students were systematically pessimistic about difficult exams, significantly underestimating their relative standing. This happens because difficulty makes uncertainty salient, and you interpret your uncertainty as evidence you’re doing worse than others who (you assume) are more certain.
In learning complex new skills like languages or instruments, the worse-than-average effect makes learners believe they’re progressing more slowly than others when progress rates are actually similar. Research shows that people learning difficult skills (advanced language grammar, complex musical pieces, challenging physical techniques) consistently rate themselves as slower learners or less talented than their peers, even when objective measures show similar progress. The difficulty makes them feel their struggle is unique when actually all learners struggle with difficult material.
Studies demonstrate that this leads to premature quitting: learners conclude they lack talent or aptitude because they’re struggling, not recognizing that their struggle is normal for the difficulty level. Language learners think “I’m terrible at languages” when actually learning advanced grammar is objectively difficult for everyone. Musicians think “I have no talent” when actually the piece they’re learning is genuinely challenging for their level.
In professional tasks requiring high expertise and complex problem-solving, the worse-than-average effect makes competent professionals feel like impostors. Research shows that people in intellectually demanding fields (academia, medicine, law, engineering, research) often feel they’re less competent than colleagues despite objective evidence of comparable or superior performance. The complex nature of the work makes everyone struggle periodically, but each person interprets their own struggle as evidence of inadequacy while assuming colleagues aren’t struggling as much.
Studies from Harvard Medical School found that medical residents and junior doctors frequently rated themselves as less competent than peers despite supervisors rating them as average or above-average. The complex, high-stakes nature of medical decisions makes doctors acutely aware of their uncertainty and near-misses, leading to feeling worse than colleagues who (they assume) are more confident and certain, when actually all doctors experience similar uncertainty.
In creative and artistic pursuits with subjective standards, the worse-than-average effect makes artists underestimate their work’s quality relative to others’. Research shows that when artists (writers, visual artists, musicians) evaluate their own work in genuinely difficult creative domains, they consistently rate it as worse than average compared to peers, even when external judges rate it as average or above. The difficulty of the creative challenge makes artists acutely aware of the gap between their vision and execution, leading them to assume others’ work is closer to their visions.
Studies from University of California, Los Angeles found that creative writing students consistently rated their stories as worse than classmates’ stories, with most students placing themselves in the bottom third of the class despite similar objective quality. This happened because the difficulty of translating internal vision into written words made each writer feel their execution fell short, assuming others’ executions were more successful when actually all faced similar vision-execution gaps.
In physical fitness and athletic performance at challenging levels, the worse-than-average effect makes people underestimate their relative fitness when exercises are genuinely difficult. Research shows that during challenging group fitness classes or sports training where most participants struggle, individuals consistently believe they’re among the least fit or capable participants even when they’re performing at average or above-average levels. The physical difficulty makes them acutely aware of their struggle while underestimating how much others are struggling.
Studies demonstrate that this affects motivation and persistence: people quit difficult fitness programs thinking they’re uniquely unfit when actually they’re progressing normally for the difficulty level. Someone struggling with an advanced yoga pose thinks “I’m the least flexible person here” when actually most people in the class are struggling with the same pose but hiding their difficulty.
Recognizing That Difficulty Is Shared, Not Personal Failure
The most important practice for countering the worse-than-average effect is recognizing that when something is genuinely difficult, your struggle probably isn’t evidence you’re worse than others—it’s evidence the task is difficult for everyone. When you find yourself thinking “I’m struggling with this while everyone else is succeeding,” check: Is the task objectively difficult? If yes, probably others are struggling too but you’re not seeing their struggle. Your struggle is normal, not evidence of unique inadequacy.
Before concluding you’re bad at something difficult, seek objective performance data rather than relying on feeling. The worse-than-average effect makes difficulty feel like personal failure. Check actual results: What’s your score, rank, or objective measure? Often you’ll discover you’re performing average or above despite feeling worse than average. Feelings of incompetence on difficult tasks are unreliable indicators of actual performance.
Talk to others about the difficulty rather than hiding your struggle. The worse-than-average effect persists partly because everyone hides their struggle, making everyone think they’re uniquely struggling. If you share “I’m finding this really difficult,” you’ll often hear “Me too!” from people you assumed were succeeding easily. Breaking the silence reveals that difficulty is shared, counteracting the illusion that you’re alone in struggling.
Calibrate your expectations to the task’s difficulty. The worse-than-average effect makes you expect easier progress than the task allows, then interpret normal difficulty as personal failure. If a task is objectively very difficult (advanced mathematics, complex language, difficult instrument), expect to struggle—that’s what difficult means. Your struggle is task-appropriate, not evidence you lack ability.
Remember that you see your internal struggle but only others’ external confidence. This information asymmetry creates illusion that you’re struggling while they’re not. Everyone shows confidence externally while struggling internally. Don’t compare your internal experience to others’ external presentation—compare your performance to theirs, which is often more similar than it feels.
Remember Rohan and Priya who both thought they performed terribly on the difficult math Olympiad but actually scored in the 78th and 82nd percentiles, and Arjun who thought he was the worst climber but was actually progressing normally on a difficult mountain. Both illustrate how the worse-than-average effect makes difficult challenges feel like personal failure when actually you’re performing comparably to others who are also struggling but hiding it.
The worse-than-average effect can’t be eliminated because you’ll always have more direct access to your own struggle than to others’, and difficult tasks do make everyone feel incompetent. But recognizing the bias allows correction: when genuinely difficult tasks make you feel uniquely inadequate, remember that difficulty affects everyone similarly even when you can’t see it. Your struggle doesn’t mean you’re worse than others—it means the task is difficult, which it is for all who attempt it. Persist through the difficulty, knowing that your struggle is normal and that others who appear to be succeeding easily are likely experiencing similar internal difficulty they’re just better at hiding.
Frequently Asked Questions
How can I tell if I’m actually worse than average versus just experiencing this bias?
Check objective performance data if available (test scores, rankings, completion times). If the task is genuinely difficult and you’re performing at or above the median in objective measures, the worse-than-average effect is likely operating. Also check: Are you assuming others found it easier based on their external confidence? External confidence is unreliable—most people hide struggle. If the task is objectively difficult, assume most people are struggling even if they don’t show it.
Doesn’t feeling like I’m bad at something difficult help me recognize I should focus on easier tasks?
Sometimes yes—if you’re consistently performing objectively poorly despite effort, different pursuits might suit you better. But the worse-than-average effect makes you feel you’re performing poorly when you’re not, leading to premature quitting of difficult things you could succeed at with persistence. Check objective evidence before quitting based on feelings. Often people quit things they could master because difficulty made them feel uniquely inadequate.
Why do I underestimate myself on hard tasks but overestimate on easy tasks?
On easy tasks, you succeed and assume you succeeded more than others (better-than-average effect). On hard tasks, you struggle and assume you struggled more than others (worse-than-average effect). Both reflect difficulty seeing others’ internal experiences. Easy tasks: you don’t realize how easy they were for others. Hard tasks: you don’t realize how hard they were for others. You anchor on your own experience without accurate information about others’.
If everyone struggles with difficult tasks, how do some people become experts?
Experts struggled too when learning—they just persisted through the phase where the worse-than-average effect made them feel uniquely incompetent. What distinguishes experts isn’t that they didn’t struggle (they did) but that they didn’t interpret struggle as evidence they should quit. They recognized struggle as normal for difficult learning, not as evidence of inadequacy. Persistence through difficulty, not absence of difficulty, creates expertise.
Should I trust my feelings about my performance on difficult tasks?
Your feelings are useful information about task difficulty (if something feels hard, it probably is hard) but unreliable information about your relative performance. On difficult tasks, feelings of inadequacy are normal for everyone, including people performing well. Don’t let difficult tasks’ normal psychological difficulty (feeling incompetent) become evidence you’re actually incompetent relative to others. Trust objective measures, not feelings, for assessing relative performance on difficult tasks.
Observer Voice is the one stop site for National, International news, Sports, Editor’s Choice, Art/culture contents, Quotes and much more. We also cover historical contents. Historical contents includes World History, Indian History, and what happened today. The website also covers Entertainment across the India and World.
