Supreme Court Questions Centre on Airfare Fluctuation Case, Sets Deadline for Affidavit Submission
The Supreme Court of India has expressed frustration over the Centre’s repeated failure to submit an affidavit in a case concerning the regulation of airfares and ancillary charges imposed by private airlines. Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta demanded an explanation from the Union government for the delays, emphasizing the need for a stronger regulatory framework to protect passengers and ensure transparency in the aviation sector. The court has set a deadline for the government to file the necessary documents, underscoring the urgency of the matter.
Supreme Court’s Concerns Over Delays
During a recent hearing, the Supreme Court questioned the Union government’s inability to file an affidavit despite multiple opportunities. The case revolves around a petition that seeks to establish a more robust regulatory body to oversee the civil aviation sector, particularly in light of unpredictable fluctuations in airfares. The bench, led by Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta, pressed the government to clarify its stance, especially after the Centre’s counsel cited ongoing developments in the Middle East as a reason for the delay. The justices were clear in their demand, stating, “What is this? What prevents you from filing an affidavit?” This highlights the court’s growing impatience with the government’s lack of action.
Petition Highlights Airline Practices
The petition, filed by social activist S. Laxminarayanan, raises significant concerns regarding the practices of private airlines. It alleges that airlines have unjustifiably reduced the free check-in baggage allowance for economy passengers from 25 kg to 15 kg, effectively transforming a previously included service into an additional revenue stream. Furthermore, the petition challenges the policy that permits only one piece of check-in baggage, arguing that passengers who do not utilize baggage receive no financial benefit. This situation has led to increased costs for travelers, particularly affecting those who are less affluent or who need to book flights at the last minute.
Call for Regulatory Oversight
The Supreme Court has noted that there is currently no authority with the power to review or cap airfares or ancillary fees. This lack of oversight allows airlines to impose hidden charges and unpredictable pricing, which the petition claims infringes on citizens’ fundamental rights. The petition argues that the unregulated nature of airline pricing leads to arbitrary fare hikes during peak times, such as festivals or emergencies, disproportionately impacting vulnerable travelers. The court has previously described steep airfare increases as “exploitation,” emphasizing the need for a regulatory framework that protects passengers from such practices.
Next Steps in the Legal Process
In its latest order, the Supreme Court has mandated that the Centre file its affidavit by next week, specifically by May 8. The court has made it clear that it will not accept any further requests for extensions. The justices have instructed the government to provide a detailed explanation for the delays and to outline the steps being taken to address the issues raised in the petition. The case will be revisited on May 11, as the court continues to press for accountability and transparency in the aviation sector. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for air travel regulations in India, particularly in terms of consumer rights and protections.
Observer Voice is the one stop site for National, International news, Sports, Editor’s Choice, Art/culture contents, Quotes and much more. We also cover historical contents. Historical contents includes World History, Indian History, and what happened today. The website also covers Entertainment across the India and World.
Follow Us on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, & LinkedIn
