Kirloskar Companies Challenge SEBI’s Disclosure Order
The Kirloskar Group, a prominent name in Indian industry, is embroiled in a legal dispute with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). Four companies under the Kirloskar banner—Kirloskar Ferrous Industries (KFIL), Kirloskar Industries (KIL), Kirloskar Pneumatic Company, and Kirloskar Oil Engines—have announced their intention to legally contest a directive from SEBI. This directive requires them to disclose a family settlement deed signed by Kirloskar family members in 2009. The companies assert that they are not bound by this deed and that it does not impose any restrictions or liabilities on them. This article delves into the details of the dispute, the implications for the companies involved, and the ongoing family feud that has led to this legal confrontation.
Background of the Family Settlement Dispute
The Kirloskar family has a long and storied history in Indian business, dating back over 130 years. However, since 2016, the family has been embroiled in a contentious feud regarding the deed of family settlement (DFS) signed on September 11, 2009. This settlement was intended to outline the distribution of family assets among the Kirloskar siblings. The conflict primarily involves Sanjay Kirloskar, the Chairman and Managing Director of Kirloskar Brothers, and his brothers Atul and Rahul Kirloskar, who lead Kirloskar Oil Engines and Kirloskar Pneumatic, respectively.
The DFS has been a point of contention, with the question of its binding nature still pending in civil court since 2018. The ongoing legal battle has created a complex web of disputes that not only affects the family but also the companies they manage. The Kirloskar companies maintain that the DFS does not impose any obligations on them, arguing that SEBI’s directive to disclose the settlement is unwarranted and ignores established legal principles.
SEBI’s Directive and Companies’ Response
On December 30, 2024, SEBI issued a letter to the Kirloskar companies, instructing them to disclose the DFS under the SEBI listing obligations and disclosure requirements regulations. SEBI argued that the DFS, being a subsisting agreement, indirectly creates restrictions on the listed entities managed by the parties involved. The companies responded with separate regulatory filings, asserting that they are not bound by the DFS and that it does not affect their operations or create any liabilities.
The Kirloskar companies have expressed their intention to challenge SEBI’s directive through legal proceedings. They argue that SEBI’s decision is not only factually inaccurate but also disregards settled principles of contract and corporate law. The companies maintain that they are not required to disclose the DFS, as it does not pertain to their corporate governance or operations.
Implications for the Kirloskar Group
The legal battle between the Kirloskar companies and SEBI has significant implications for the Kirloskar Group. The outcome of this dispute could set a precedent for how family settlements are treated in corporate governance. If SEBI’s directive is upheld, it may compel other companies with similar family structures to disclose private agreements, potentially leading to increased scrutiny of family-owned businesses. Moreover, the ongoing feud among the Kirloskar siblings could impact the group’s reputation and operational stability. Investors and stakeholders may view the internal conflict as a risk factor, potentially affecting the companies’ market performance. The Kirloskar Group has long been regarded as a pillar of Indian industry, and any disruption in its operations could have broader implications for the sectors in which it operates.
Observer Voice is the one stop site for National, International news, Editor’s Choice, Art/culture contents, Quotes and much more. We also cover historical contents. Historical contents includes World History, Indian History, and what happened today. The website also covers Entertainment across the India and World.