Can I still be hacked with 2FA enabled?

David Tuffley

Shutterstock

David Tuffley, Griffith University

Cybersecurity is like a game of whack-a-mole. As soon as the good guys put a stop to one type of attack, another pops up.

Usernames and passwords were once good enough to keep an account secure. But before long, cybercriminals figured out how to get around this.

Often theyโ€™ll use โ€œbrute force attacksโ€, bombarding a userโ€™s account with various password and login combinations in a bid to guess the correct one.

To deal with such attacks, a second layer of security was added in an approach known as two-factor authentication, or 2FA. Itโ€™s widespread now, but does 2FA also leave room for loopholes cybercriminals can exploit? https://giphy.com/embed/IgLIVXrBcID9cExa6r

2FA via text message

There are various types of 2FA. The most common method is to be sent a single-use code as an SMS message to your phone, which you then enter following a prompt from the website or service youโ€™re trying to access.

Most of us are familiar with this method as itโ€™s favoured by major social media platforms. However, while it may seem safe enough, it isnโ€™t necessarily.

Hackers have been known to trick mobile phone carriers (such as Telstra or Optus) into transferring a victimโ€™s phone number to their own phone.

Pretending to be the intended victim, the hacker contacts the carrier with a story about losing their phone, requesting a new SIM with the victimโ€™s number to be sent to them. Any authentication code sent to that number then goes directly to the hacker, granting them access to the victimโ€™s accounts.
This method is called SIM swapping. Itโ€™s probably the easiest of several types of scams that can circumvent 2FA.

And while carriersโ€™ verification processes for SIM requests are improving, a competent trickster can talk their way around them.

Authenticator apps

The authenticator method is more secure than 2FA via text message. It works on a principle known as TOTP, or โ€œtime-based one-time passwordโ€.

TOTP is more secure than SMS because a code is generated on your device rather than being sent across the network, where it might be intercepted.

The authenticator method uses apps such as Google Authenticator, LastPass, 1Password, Microsoft Authenticator, Authy and Yubico.

However, while itโ€™s safer than 2FA via SMS, there have been reports of hackers stealing authentication codes from Android smartphones. They do this by tricking the user into installing malware (software designed to cause harm) that copies and sends the codes to the hacker.

The Android operating system is easier to hack than the iPhone iOS. Appleโ€™s iOS is proprietary, while Android is open-source, making it easier to install malware on.

2FA using details unique to you

Biometric methods are another form of 2FA. These include fingerprint login, face recognition, retinal or iris scans, and voice recognition. Biometric identification is becoming popular for its ease of use.

Most smartphones today can be unlocked by placing a finger on the scanner or letting the camera scan your face โ€“ much quicker than entering a password or passcode.

However, biometric data can be hacked, too, either from the servers where they are stored or from the software that processes the data.

One case in point is last yearโ€™s Biostar 2 data breach in which nearly 28 million biometric records were hacked. BioStar 2 is a security system that uses facial recognition and fingerprinting technology to help organisations secure access to buildings.

There can also be false negatives and false positives in biometric recognition. Dirt on the fingerprint reader or on the personโ€™s finger can lead to false negatives. Also, faces can sometimes be similar enough to fool facial recognition systems. https://giphy.com/embed/jnEQ1YoSLy9gSic7Qv

Another type of 2FA comes in the form of personal security questions such as โ€œwhat city did your parents meet in?โ€ or โ€œwhat was your first petโ€™s name?โ€

Only the most determined and resourceful hacker will be able to find answers to these questions. Itโ€™s unlikely, but still possible, especially as more of us adopt public online profiles.

Person looks at a social media post from a woman, on their mobile.
Often when we share our lives on the internet, we fail to consider what kinds of people may be watching. Shutterstock

2FA remains best practice

Despite all of the above, the biggest vulnerability to being hacked is still the human factor. Successful hackers have a bewildering array of psychological tricks in their arsenal.

A cyber attack could come as a polite request, a scary warning, a message ostensibly from a friend or colleague, or an intriguing โ€œclickbaitโ€ link in an email.

The best way to protect yourself from hackers is to develop a healthy amount of scepticism. If you carefully check websites and links before clicking through and also use 2FA, the chances of being hacked become vanishingly small.

The bottom line is that 2FA is effective at keeping your accounts safe. However, try to avoid the less secure SMS method when given the option.

Just as burglars in the real world focus on houses with poor security, hackers on the internet look for weaknesses.

And while any security measure can be overcome with enough effort, a hacker wonโ€™t make that investment unless they stand to gain something of greater value.

David Tuffley, Senior Lecturer in Applied Ethics & CyberSecurity, Griffith University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.


Observer Voice is the one stop site for National, International news, Editorโ€™s Choice, Art/culture contents, Quotes and much more. We also cover historical contents. Historical contents includes World History, Indian History, and what happened today. The website also covers Entertainment across the India and World.

Follow Us on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, & LinkedIn